Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Cuba's Election.... Gets No US Coverage

The tyrannical outpost of Cuba held local and provincial elections on Sunday, with turnout that exceeded 96 (a figure rarely topped by countries where voting is mandaded). The delegates were chosen directly by local people in town hall settings, their campaigns were simple and funded by the people. There was no involvement of the Communist Party at all. The reason we know nothing about this in America is that it does not fit well within what we think we know about Cuba. So we ignore it.

Cubans Cast Ballots in Municipal Elections, Which Castro Lauds As 'Most Democratic in the World'

The Associated Press

More than 8 million Cubans on Sunday were electing 169 municipal assemblies across the island in elections that take place every 2 1/2 years.

Under Cuba's one-party system, city and provincial leaders, as well as representatives of the National Assembly, are elected by citizens on a local level. Anyone can be nominated to these posts, including non-members of the island's ruling communist party the only one recognized in Cuba's constitution.

The island's top leader, however, is not elected directly by citizens to the post of president. Representatives of the National Assembly nominate, then elect the president.

In Old Havana, voting sites were set up at schools and office buildings every few blocks. Signs saying "Vote early," and "Choose the best and most capable," were set up outside the booths alongside candidates' resumes.

Resumes included a photograph and listed age, marital status, education and experience of the candidates. Membership in the communist party was often included.

Cuba consistently defends its system as democratic, but critics of Castro's government argue that tight state control, a heavy police presence and neighborhood-watch groups that report on their neighbors prevent any real political freedom on the island.

Parliament Speaker Ricardo Alarcon said Cuba's electoral process was "superior to the multiparty system," arguing that it was real pluralism.

"In other words, everyone within society can nominate whoever they want, and then make up their own minds," he said.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is it possible - at all possible that the US has better things to cover than the voting process of other countries? You're an advocate of Cuba so of course you whine about the US not caring about Cuba as much as you do. Maybe the US just doesn't care about every election in every country every year. Just a thought.

3:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home